Sometimes I read things in blog that leaves me a bit 'confused and give me the measure of how much uncertainty there is in people also very smart and careful, which I interpret uncertainty as fair and elegant restraint. I know that with this open statement does straighten the spines of experts of systematic doubt, or even of people who, for their modesty, avoid naming specific things for fear of offending or wrong. I know I should take some lessons in style but this should not be confused with the fact that I'm wrong.
I quote in part a response that gave me a virtual friend whom I respect, I do not invade her pretty picky with my blog, I hope you will understand and I do not want to.
says his reply (his post was about a couple with a young and she him a rich and ugly):
"... I have not felt as a sort of puttanesimo, at least she showed me affection, but situation is commonly accepted, since the world world and the money make a man attractive also insignificant. "
I understand that my friend merely states a fact but does not want to take responsibility for saying that, except if you are proposing, in general, those puttanesimo . After he exhorted the girls also our chairman of the board of being a rich man. What is common practice not doubt it, but my house is called puttanesimo, which is equivalent all'anaffettività absolute. Because if we exclude the poor beaten on the road from nasty tormentors destroying their fragile identity, the rest are real whores in the worst sense of the word. Hookers killers and victims of a culture that has replaced the muscular power of the male animal with the economic power of the male "civilized." But this is still an animal.
who follows me for a while 'of time knows that I maintain that the human being is an animal and then human beings who have the vision to fund carries a blindness violent and stupid that will make sick people who can not reject it.
I note that my friend thinks she noted that the relationship is not of puttanesimo and I'm happy, I hope so too. But then it means that it is a relationship in which the money, which is a material object, you prefer the internal substance of the other, which is not material. If you're a beautiful girl with an "old man" they tend to see the worst, because you know that instead could be a relation of desire to drastically change the minds little accustomed to freedom. Very few are able to "bear" the vision of that relationship without being envious, especially it is impossible for those who have a vision of human beings as animals. So my sincere wishes to the couple does not "normal" if normality is puttanesimo or puppets. I have already written somewhere that freedom makes it unpredictable only healthy people, while they still the same crazy cancellations.
conclude, however, reminding my friend that my comment was quite articulate (even though I know that it is not escaped), even within the limits of a few lines allowed. I asked myself the enormous problem of love for the oldest, the youngest, in which, always on the good health of both of them, very often we run the risk of violence unseen, from which you can fall in the abasement of both. The old man asks the young man to see what he sees, the young man asks the same. The balance of these two forces is the miracle of rare genius of certain relationships that are transformative and creative ... until they can last. And I must point out that these relations should never be understood in the Greek style of the mentor with the student, otherwise it would be homosexual rape (the Greeks had not reached the conceptualization of human sexuality), are instead understood as a relationship with the utterly different from himself and for this reason can reach absolute moments of creativity, otherwise trivial identification of parent-child or even worse.
0 comments:
Post a Comment