A post not suitable for long lazy. 
I was thinking about the debate that there was Mel Books in Florence for the latest book by Massimo Fagioli "Left2007" We were pigiatissimi despite four hundred people, but when there is so much Beans should always end up half way. The level of discussion is always very high, the beads to take home are so many that you can not ever keep them all, and I've always said that this is to attend a genius because we realize how little intelligence and whether its that does so much to tell even a few things, will always be too much for the normal capacity of my tiny brain to contain them all. But the style at the table says that we should not binge, there will be time to sample all, each according to his abilities, which here take the first class is deficient.
Luckily there is a video online that allows me to recapture some pearl drop or not seen.
In fact, when a certain press saw these phenomena, still started the attack with the labels and then via a sfegiare Guru or holy man calling the psychiatrist or other such amenities. Totally avoiding the fact that the psychiatrist in question has a curriculum to embarrass any of his other colleague. Obviously the goal is scarring the image to deny the scientific discourse that is connected to it. But this stuff is now old, take the heel as they say, has few concerns scempiotti Enlightenment culture and a type that spreads more "La Repubblica".
Instead, what has always intrigued me is the terrible dynamic that sees reason to hide themselves in piety.
fact we know that the reason he sees only what appears and does not care what is hidden and not perceptible to the senses. This is the key reason why, when it comes to psychic reality, we find ourselves in a chaos of opinions and conjectures, or philosophical views of religious nonsense. There has never been a study that had all the requirements of science. They needed a qualitative leap in the methodology of thought, so there was free obtuse positivistic nineteenth century without falling into dogmatism or nell'elucubrazione philosophical. There shall be a medical science that transcends the limits of the visible and audible to reach the deductible.
So far I've seen people, even very close to me, know that despite the existence of a scientific theory exposed in a speech and comprehensive, it does not read a page. Proper respect for their freedom, but a little question from me, motherfucker I do, I'm just indifferent? Or have realized what could be in those books and they must deny a priori? And why should they stupidly do this denial a priori? What escapes them? Or what NOT to escape them? I say this because I would understand the criticism if he had read and understood the first one, if not all, at least something. Rather inexplicably refuse. I would be inclined to think that sometimes become overwhelmed with fear. Why do I say this? Why do some press, over the years, has made the job of destroying the image, depicting the group as if it were a mass of potted plants. Obvious is not it? If there is a guru or guru who attends is therefore a stoned idiot. Instead, they are fools to believe them, because they think instead of believing should confirm that person without fear of being "brainwashed". Evidently there are religious and believe in the influences of spirits ... And then let them of course the freedom to believe what they want, but knowing that you are already autoesclusi the ability to think and learn.
make me put in a distant story, when in the eighties, he published a vitriolic article on the messenger (if I remember correctly). A fierce pile of accusations and insults without the slightest competence and knowledge of the subject. Then it was discovered that the reporter was a little girl. We surprised a lot of this "omnipotence" however silly, but the recipient of the charges, with seraphic calm, said that behind the "flirt" was an ancient culture and that she was only a poor killers of this dominant mentality. The question becomes more profound if we consider that is the idea that no one can resist the urge for annulment, because it leads to madness (Van Gogh and many artists may be an example). What is the "trick" totally unconscious? That's not to recognize that there is instead, primarily affected, sometimes in complete and total "good faith" even if it is a bona fide mental illness that hides the "normal" (a little 'speech that the "blood of toad "of the Nazis did). If something disturbs the
you disappear, for the physiological dynamics that is taken at birth, or the "disappearance fantasy" that is new to the absolute opposite of the outside world. Dynamics that enable the emergence of reality psychic with the formation of the first mental image that integrates the vitality we will search for a breast. If then there is the breast, but only physically, the first image fails and you get sick.
For this reason alone is a poor crutch and nothing can raid in front of an unconscious that is sick.
What disturbs in any way, is the appearance of a new way of thinking that makes the old one lame reason and that does not allow the unconscious to be considered "crazy" by nature. If one is mad because they did is sick, not born schizophrenic or psychotic or paranoid or depressed or anorexic or hysterical. And what makes us sick? Cancellations, manifested nell'anaffettività others. Just one drive that many continue to act against a scientific discovery that has revealed clear. In a sense it's like an infected wound with a spit on Fleming. The mental illness of "normal" makes these jokes. If running an organic medicine in the arms of the doctor to get help, often in medicine of the mind is almost the opposite, and this has to be said for honesty, thanks to a culture that has always done everything to prevent it ever did a serious research on the human reality, by spreading a meandering conviction that there is no cure mental illness. Sometimes there is incurable, but not the cerebral disease, poor, have an organic lesion and those in need of neurologists, while Hitler is incurable, but, as someone said, maybe we are concerned about the suicide of Hitler?
who believes he can solve everything with reason inevitably calls for religion to take care of everything that is not right and the damage is done. Although it claims to be atheist. Why do we always believe that the irrational and madness, in a permanent split between body and soul. Only
discovering the instinct you can cancel the deal and not go crazy in front of those who acts or operates. And it is an almost everyday unfortunately ... just read the newspapers, or just look around, sometimes even more expensive to love, which cancels all your research and smile tells you that a review is like any other.
In science you can not have opinions otherwise is not science.
And then I smile thinking of Copernicus with regard to things a day observed.
After the discovery of the formation of the retina around the twenty-fourth week he's recently added another that shows who is the light to activate the brain substance and that you even a single photon. The breath has nothing to do, it's just a result. So that no more breaking balls with little question, "and the blind from birth as they do?" There are no blind dala birth, because it is proven that a fetus does not have the capacity to be stimulated the light dies before birth.
And then a confirmation is to emphasize the correctness of the theory, pace of the positivists, and why not even the spiritualists.
I had barely time to write this post that stupidity and lies back to the attack as if nothing had happened. Cynically point out that fall to the bean in support of what I said at the beginning. I'll put the link
Beans wrote the letter to the editorial staff of the Unit to guard against obscene lies that some journalists write lightly. But these journalists what are they made? What they have in their pens abysmal idiocy?
PS but more than lucid idiocy and crime, also the service of a culture of reason and religion.
.jpg)
